Key data
| Regulation | Resolution of 28 October 2026, from the Presidency of the AESIA Board of Directors |
|---|---|
| BOE Publication | 2 November 2026 |
| Entry into force | 2 November 2026 |
| Affected parties | Public officials and artificial intelligence sector supervised by AESIA |
| Category | Public Sector |
| Year | 2026 |
| Position covered | Subdirectorate of Certification, AI Trends Evaluation, Coordination and Training |
| Headquarters | A Coruña |
| Position level | 30 (maximum usual in the AGE for subdirectors general) |
| Appointee | Mario Hernández Ramos |
| Body of origin | Associate Professors of University (UCM) |
| Regulation for taking office | Royal Decree 364/1995 |
| Appeal deadline | 1 month from publication |
| Administrative litigation deadline | 2 months from publication |
The Spanish Agency for Artificial Intelligence Supervision (AESIA) has just filled one of its most relevant management positions: the Subdirectorate of Certification, AI Trends Evaluation, Coordination and Training. The appointment, published in the BOE on 2 November 2026, falls to Mario Hernández Ramos, a civil servant from the Body of Associate Professors of University assigned from the Complutense University of Madrid.
For companies in the technology sector and for any organization using AI systems classified as high-risk under the Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on Artificial Intelligence, this appointment has a direct reading: AESIA is building its institutional muscle to supervise, certify and evaluate. The regulatory machinery is being set in motion.
What does this regulation establish?
The resolution resolves the free appointment call published on 12 September 2026 to fill the Subdirectorate of Certification, AI Trends Evaluation, Coordination and Training at AESIA, headquartered in A Coruña.
| Data | Detail |
|---|---|
| Person appointed | Mario Hernández Ramos |
| Position | Subdirector of Certification, AI Trends Evaluation, Coordination and Training |
| Position level | 30 |
| Headquarters | A Coruña |
| Body of origin | Associate Professors of University |
| University assignment | Complutense University of Madrid |
| Provision method | Free appointment |
| Regulation governing taking office | Royal Decree 364/1995 |
Level 30 is the maximum usual in the General State Administration for subdirector general positions. It indicates the maximum management responsibility within the AESIA structure for this specific area.
The resolution can be appealed for reconsideration within one month from its publication, or directly to the administrative litigation jurisdiction within two months.
Economic and operational impact
This appointment does not generate direct costs for private companies, but has clear operational implications for those under AESIA's radar:
- Greater certification capacity: The covered subdirectorate is precisely responsible for AI system certification processes. With a responsible in place, conformity evaluation procedures can move forward more swiftly.
- Active trends evaluation: The area also covers AI trends evaluation, which means AESIA will actively monitor the technological evolution of the sector to anticipate regulatory risks.
- Training and coordination: The subdirectorate has competencies in training and coordination, which can translate into guides, interpretive criteria and communications directed at companies required to comply with the AI Regulation.
- Academic profile in the position: The appointment of an Associate Professor of University (UCM) suggests a technical and rigorous approach to AI system evaluation, with potential impact on how high-risk system requirements are interpreted.
Who does it affect?
- Technology companies that develop AI systems classified as high-risk under the European AI Regulation (healthcare, employment, education, critical infrastructure, etc.).
- AI providers that commercialize products in the Spanish market and must obtain certifications or pass conformity evaluations.
- Public bodies that deploy AI systems in their administrative processes.
- Consultancies and audit firms specialized in AI regulatory compliance that operate as intermediaries with AESIA.
- Public officials who aspire to positions at AESIA or who are affected by the free appointment structure resolved.
Practical example
A software company that commercializes an AI system for personnel selection — classified as high-risk under the European Regulation — needs to pass a conformity evaluation before launching it on the Spanish market.
Until now, AESIA lacked a formal responsible in the Certification Subdirectorate. With Mario Hernández Ramos in the position (level 30, A Coruña headquarters), the company can expect that evaluation processes have a defined contact, clearer criteria and more predictable response times. The academic profile of the new subdirector also suggests that the technical evaluation of systems will be rigorous and evidence-based.
In practice: if your company plans to submit an AI system for evaluation before AESIA in the coming months, this appointment is a signal that the body is operationally ready to manage those procedures.
What should companies do now?
- Identify if your AI system is high-risk according to the annexes of the European AI Regulation. If it is, AESIA is your competent supervisor in Spain and this subdirectorate will manage your certification.
- Review your compliance roadmap with the AI Regulation. With AESIA's structure already operational, regulatory deadlines are becoming real and enforceable.
- Establish a monitoring channel with AESIA. With a Certification Subdirector in place, now is the time to initiate formal contacts if you have systems pending evaluation.
- Update your regulatory risk analysis to include active AESIA supervision as an operational variable, not just as a future risk.
- If you are a public official and consider that the resolution affects you, remember that the deadline to appeal for reconsideration is one month from 2 November 2026, and two months for the administrative litigation route.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Certification and Evaluation Subdirectorate of AESIA?
It is the management unit of the Spanish Agency for Artificial Intelligence Supervision responsible for AI system certification processes, evaluation of technological trends, coordination and training in AI. It is headquartered in A Coruña and its holder occupies a level 30 position, the maximum usual in the General State Administration for subdirectors general.
Who is Mario Hernández Ramos and why is his appointment relevant?
Mario Hernández Ramos is a civil servant from the Body of Associate Professors of University, assigned from the Complutense University of Madrid. His appointment as Subdirector of Certification and Evaluation of AESIA strengthens the technical capacity of the body to supervise compliance with the European AI Regulation in Spain, with an academic profile oriented toward technical rigor in system evaluation.
When does this appointment take effect and can it be appealed?
The appointment is effective from 2 November 2026, the date of publication in the BOE. The resolution can be appealed for reconsideration within one month, or directly to the administrative litigation jurisdiction within two months from that date.
What does this appointment imply for companies with high-risk AI systems?
It means that AESIA now has a formal responsible for certification and evaluation processes. Companies that develop or deploy high-risk AI systems in Spain should anticipate more active and structured supervision, with defined contacts and clearer evaluation criteria in the coming months.
How has this position been filled and what regulation governs taking office?
The position has been filled through free appointment, a method called on 12 September 2026 and resolved on 28 October 2026. Taking office is governed by Royal Decree 364/1995, which regulates the entry of civil service personnel of the General State Administration and the provision of work positions.
Official source
Consult complete regulation at official source
Notice: This article is purely informational in nature and does not constitute legal advice. For specific decisions, consult a qualified professional. Source: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2026-22898